2020年12月3日 · As Kate Bunting says, it's individuals' I have upvoted that answer. Here the reason. Although the word individual sounds singular because it relates to one person, it is possible to have two or more individuals. This is the case …

2019年11月16日 · The worldview is that belonging to (possessed by) the individuals, so we need the possessive of that plural, which is individuals' with an S followed by an apostrophe. If multiple individuals have the same worldview, you can talk about some individuals' worldview , but if each individual has his/her/their own worldview, then you would talk ...

2013年4月16日 · The Newyorker reports: “Any responsible individuals, any responsible groups will feel the full weight of justice,” Obama said. What is correct? 'Any responsible individual' or 'Any responsible

2016年4月16日 · league: An association of states, organizations, or individuals for common action; an alliance. coterie: a small exclusive group of friends or people with common interests; clique. association: a group of people who have joined together because they have similar interests or aims

Stack Exchange Network. Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers.

We often use "Uncle" to refer to a paternalistic figure or close family friend who isn't actually related by blood or marriage. For example, I'm a godfather to the young children of a family friend...

2023年6月6日 · We will be okay [us as a couple], but regardless, we will be okay [as two individuals, regardless of the status of our relationship]. Clearly both uses of 'we' are referring to both the first and second person, however there is a clear difference in meaning. The same is apparent in this next (intentionally ambiguous) example of a company memo:

2018年3月1日 · Report is the common word used in this context. See the 4th definition under noun, in OLD: . Report. An employee who reports to another employee.

The individuals would still be called participants. Since you've edited your question, it seems you want John's friend to use a word that implies that John is just a pawn. Rather than something that is specifically about research participation, I'd recommend one of my favorites, patsy , which is insulting and implies that John is mindlessly and ...

2014年9月12日 · You could simply call such individuals cautious. You don't give any context in your question, but if you want to emphasize the planning ahead aspect, you could use foresightful, defined by the American Heritage dictionary as (among other things): n. Care in providing for the future; prudence.